Skip to content

Southern California Law Review

Volume 95 (2021-2022)

  • Home
  • Print
  • Postscript
  • Submissions
  • About Us
  • Symposium 2022

78_927

January 2018
78_927

Post navigation

Contribution and Spending Limits for Initiatives or Other Ballot Propositions: What Evidence is Needed to Justify a Particular Regulatory Regime? – Commentary by Bernard Grofman

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bibliography
  • Commentary
  • Forums
  • Introduction
  • Issues
  • News
  • Notes
  • Postscript
  • Reports
  • Uncategorized

Top Posts

  • The Undesirability of Mandatory Time-Based Sunsets in Dual Class Share Structures: A Reply to Bebchuck and Kastiel - Postscript (Comment) by Bernard S. Sharfman
  • Labor's New Localism
  • Essay: The Enduring and Universal Principle of “Fair Notice” - Article by Theodore J. Boutros, Jr. & Blaine H. Evanson
  • Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Asserting U.S. Interest or Foreign Intrusion?
  • A National Study of Immigration Detention in the United States - Article by Emily Ryo & Ian Peacock
  • The Harm Principle and Free Speech - Article by Rebecca L. Brown
  • Transgender Rights & the Eighth Amendment
  • An Impossible Standard: The California Parole Board Process for Inmates with Cognitive Impairments - Note by Amber Heron
  • Stategraft - Article by Bernadette Atuahene & Timothy R. Hodge
  • Due Process in Antitrust Enforcement: Normative and Comparative Perspectives