Skip to content

Southern California Law Review

Volume 95 (2021-2022)

  • Home
  • Print
  • Postscript
  • Submissions
  • About Us
  • Symposium 2022

78_927

January 2018
78_927

Post navigation

Contribution and Spending Limits for Initiatives or Other Ballot Propositions: What Evidence is Needed to Justify a Particular Regulatory Regime? – Commentary by Bernard Grofman

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bibliography
  • Commentary
  • Forums
  • Introduction
  • Issues
  • News
  • Notes
  • Postscript
  • Reports
  • Uncategorized

Top Posts

  • Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Asserting U.S. Interest or Foreign Intrusion?
  • Detention, Disenfranchisement, and Doctrinal Integration
  • Book Review: Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court by Richard H. Fallon, Jr. - Postscript (Comment) by André LeDuc
  • Motive’s Role in Criminal Punishment - Article by Carissa Byrne Hessick
  • Labor’s New Localism
  • A Dose of Dignity: Equitable Vaccination Policies for Incarcerated People and Correctional Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Itay Ravid, Jordan M. Hyatt, and Steven L. Chanenson
  • The Limits of the Interstate Commerce Power: How to Decide the Close Cases - Postscript by R. George Wright
  • Tracing the Diverse History of Corporate Residual Claimants by Sung Eun ("Summer") Kim
  • Fredrick Douglas and the Hidden Power of Recording Deeds
  • Recovering Our Forgotten Preamble - Article by John W. Welch & James A. Heilpern