Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy – Article by Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley

From Volume 81, Number 1 (November 2007)
DOWNLOAD PDF

Recent social science research suggests that many if not most judgments about criminal liability and punishment for serious wrongdoing are intuitional rather than reasoned. Further, such intuitions of justice are nuanced and widely shared, even though they concern matters that seem quite complex and subjective. While people may debate the source of these intuitions, it seems clear that, whatever their source, it must be one that is insulated from the influence of much of human experience because, if it were not, one would see differences in intuitions reflecting the vast differences in human existence across demographics and societies.


 

81_1