Skip to content

Southern California Law Review

Volume 95 (2021-2022)

  • Home
  • Print
  • Postscript
  • Submissions
  • About Us
  • Symposium 2022

92_1_169

January 2019

92_1_169

Post navigation

Quid Pro No: When Rolexes, Ferraris, and Ball Gowns Are Not Political Currency – Note by Daniel Brovman

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bibliography
  • Commentary
  • Forums
  • Introduction
  • Issues
  • News
  • Notes
  • Postscript
  • Reports
  • Uncategorized

Top Posts

  • Stategraft - Article by Bernadette Atuahene & Timothy R. Hodge
  • The Modern American Law of Race by David E. Bernstein
  • Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Asserting U.S. Interest or Foreign Intrusion?
  • Guilty Beyond a Reasonable Vote: Challenging Felony Disenfranchisement Under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
  • Tracing the Diverse History of Corporate Residual Claimants by Sung Eun ("Summer") Kim
  • Crushing Creativity: The Blurred Lines Case and Its Aftermath - Postscript (Comment) by Edwin F. McPherson
  • How the First Amendment's Commitment to Religious Freedom Could Ironically Save Roe v. Wade . . . If We Let It by Abigail Sellers
  • A Dose of Dignity: Equitable Vaccination Policies for Incarcerated People and Correctional Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Itay Ravid, Jordan M. Hyatt, and Steven L. Chanenson
  • Convergence and Divergence in Systems of Property Law: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses - Article by Yun-chien Chang & Henry E. Smith
  • Prosecutors and Mass Incarceration by