Skip to content

Southern California Law Review

Volume 95 (2021-2022)

  • Home
  • Print
  • Postscript
  • Submissions
  • About Us
  • Symposium 2022

92_1_169

January 2019

92_1_169

Post navigation

Quid Pro No: When Rolexes, Ferraris, and Ball Gowns Are Not Political Currency – Note by Daniel Brovman

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bibliography
  • Commentary
  • Forums
  • Introduction
  • Issues
  • News
  • Notes
  • Postscript
  • Reports
  • Uncategorized

Top Posts

  • Just Transitions - Article by Ann M. Eisenberg
  • Home Court Advantage? The SEC and Administrative Fairness - Note by Kenneth Oshita
  • On Immigration, Information, and the New Jurisprudence of Federalism - Note by Nathaniel F. Sussman
  • Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Asserting U.S. Interest or Foreign Intrusion?
  • Civil vs. Criminal Legal Aid
  • Profound Sophistication or Legal Sophistry? - Postscript (Comment) by Ediberto Roman, Katryna Santa Cruz, Melissa Gonzalez & Dianet Torres
  • Convergence and Divergence in Systems of Property Law: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses - Article by Yun-chien Chang & Henry E. Smith
  • A National Study of Immigration Detention in the United States - Article by Emily Ryo & Ian Peacock
  • Filling the California Ninth Circuit Vacancies - Postscript (Comment) by Carl Tobias
  • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Rules, Standards, and Judicial Discretion - Article by Frank Fagan & Saul Levmore